Consensus layer statistics
Definitions on variables that appear on the "Consensus layer statistics" table of the Rated network operator explorer.
The ETH rewards earned on all the validator indices associated with said deposit address, adjusted for the Rating Time Window toggled.
Total Rewards Earned divided by Total Validators.
The sum of offline penalties accrued on all the validator indices associated with said deposit address, adjusted for the Rating Time Window toggled. For more information on how we model penalties see our model resources page here.
Total Penalties Accrued divided by Total Validators.
The sum of slashed validator indices associated with said operator address.
The sum of the times a proposer controlled by said operator address has included a slashing proof in a block they successfully proposed.
The average of Failed Block Proposals divided by Proposal Slots Attributed across the sum of the validator indices associated with said operator address.
The Participation Rate in a given Rating Time Window. If the source vote in an attestation is incorrect then the attestation is not included, thereby moderating the Participation Rate.
The amount of epoch’s a valid vote for the target checkpoint was included in the attestation divided by the number of epoch’s a validator index has been active, averaged across the sum of validators associated with said operator address.
The amount of epoch’s a valid vote for the head of the chain was included in the attestation divided by the number of epoch’s a validator index has been active, averaged across the sum of validators associated with said operator address.
This is the percentage distribution of consensus clients said operator or entity is running accross the body of validator indices that it operates.
In order to produce client distribution statistics for validator keys and accross entities we are using blockprint, an open source client classifier. Please note that the results that blockprint produces have a relatively wide statistical confidence interval.
The comparative placement of the operator’s Effectiveness rating among their peers, going by operator address. We are expressing the percentile score both in the tabular view (per entity, operator or deposit address), as well as the main navigation with colour coded dots (from deep red for lowest percentile rank to deep green for highest percentile rank). Given we are ranking multiple entities on the front-end we have two tracks along which these percentiles are computed:
- Entities: we are attributing percentile scores out of the available sample of validators, taking into account groups that appear to be operating more than 100 validators (the lowest bound that appears on the front-end).
- Operators & Deposit Addresses: we are attributing percentile scores out of the available sample of validators, taking into account groups that appear to be operating more than 5 validators (to remove the noise that is introduced by solo operators).
Last modified 4mo ago