LogoLogo
HomeCommmunityLegal
  • Getting started
    • Welcome
    • Useful links
    • Framing the problem
    • Design goals
  • Methodologies
    • Ethereum Beacon Chain
      • Resources
      • Network explorer definitions
        • Landing page
        • Entity views
          • Top screener
          • Entity overview
          • Consensus layer statistics
          • Execution layer statistics
          • Aggregate rewards statistics
        • Aggregate views
          • Trending
          • Network overview
            • Gini coefficient measurement
          • Relayer landscape
          • Builder landscape
        • Misc
          • Index Coop dsETH
      • RAVER methodology
        • Proposer effectiveness
        • Attester effectiveness
        • Effectiveness rating
        • Slashing moderator
        • Sync committees
        • Post-hoc analysis of the Rated v0 effectiveness rating
      • Penalties and Missed Rewards methodologies
        • Penalties computation
          • Pre-Altair penalties computation
        • Validator missed rewards computation
          • Consensus missed rewards computation
          • Execution missed rewards computation
      • Baseline MEV computation
      • Aggregating validator indices
        • Classes of aggregation
    • Miscellaneous
      • Value enabled by Rated
  • API documentation
    • Introduction
    • Getting past authentication
    • API guide
    • Swagger schema
  • Legal
    • ToU & Privacy Notice
      • Website Terms of Use
      • API Terms of Use
      • Privacy Notice
  • Community
    • 🍬Let's Rate!
Powered by GitBook
On this page

Was this helpful?

  1. Methodologies
  2. Ethereum Beacon Chain
  3. RAVER methodology

Sync committees

PreviousSlashing moderatorNextPost-hoc analysis of the Rated v0 effectiveness rating

Last updated 2 years ago

Was this helpful?

With the latest Beacon Chain upgrade, a new role for validator nodes was introduced; attesting to sync committees. These are duties related to enabling light clients to validate the Beacon Chain’s state. A light client only needs to know a previously validated block header and members of the previous, current, and next committee to verify the beacon state.

A sync committee is a group of 512 randomly selected validators, chosen anew every 256 epochs. This committee signs block headers for each new slot in the beacon chain so that a light client can trust these headers to represent accurate and validated blocks.

Granted the stochastic nature of sync committee selection and the low probability of a single validator to be selected in a sync committee set, we have opted for not including sync committee performance in v0.

We would love community’s input on whether or not a model of validator and operator performance should account for sync committee participation.

Join the discussion

here